Added value(s)?

During the hearing in the infringement proceedings against Hungary’s ‘anti- LGBTIQ+ Law’, the Commission placed the values of the EU at the heart of its pleas. Following its publication in the Official Journal, some expected (while others feared) that the Commission’s infringement action would rely on Article 2 TEU (which set out the values of the EU) as a self-standing ground. Instead, during the hearing, the Commission’s representatives were adamant that Article 2 may only be invoked in connection with other EU law provisions. That is a welcome clarification. Grounding an infringement action solely on Article 2 would be unwise. Yet, the inclusion of these values among the pleas is legally, politically, and morally significant.

5. Dezember 2024

, ,

Neues nur am Rande

Die große Überraschung blieb aus. Die Verfassungsbeschwerden gegen das Strompreisbremsegesetz von insgesamt 22 Betreibern von Anlagen zur grünen Stromerzeugung wurden zurückgewiesen (Az.:1 BvR 460/23, 1 BvR 611/23). Blickt man allein auf die tragenden Gründe für die Erfolglosigkeit der Beschwerden, hält das Urteil in der Tat wenig Überraschendes bereit. Interessant wird die Entscheidung allerdings in ihren Randbereichen und abseits der tragenden Gründe.

4. Dezember 2024

, , , ,

Under Guise of War

The Knesset’s legislative work since October 2023 has included several legislative initiatives that may be creating a framework for furthering systemic discrimination against Arab Israelis. These new laws could pose a dangerous new precedent in Israel, stripping the right to equality and human dignity of their meaning and threatening the already fragile state of democracy as we know it.

4. Dezember 2024

, , , , , , ,

The Return of Not-Quite „Phantom Experts“?

On Monday, 2 December 2024, the much anticipated hearing began in the Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change advisory proceedings before the International Court of Justice. Less than a week before the start of the hearing, the Court issued a brief and unusual press release about a meeting that it held with scientists from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The Court’s decision to meet privately with the scientists raises questions about the Court’s procedures and its approach to evidence. Above all, it is unclear why the Court decided to consult with the IPCC scientists in a closed meeting rather than eliciting testimony from these individuals as part of the formal, public hearing.

3. Dezember 2024

, , , ,

Eine Schwangerschaft, eine Beziehung

Aktuell liegt ein fraktionsübergreifender Gesetzentwurf zum Schwangerschaftsabbruch vor, der eine begrenzte Liberalisierung des deutschen Rechts vorsieht. Kritiker*innen werfen dem Entwurf vor, einseitig die Rechte der schwangeren Frau gegenüber dem ungeborenen Leben durchzusetzen. Diese Kritiken zeigen die Schwangerschaft fälschlicherweise als Konflikt zwischen zwei antagonistischen Individuen. Schwangerschaft ist ein komplexer Entwicklungsprozess, der tiefgreifend die Identität der Schwangeren berührt und von der Beziehung zwischen Schwangeren und Ungeborenem geprägt ist.

3. Dezember 2024

, , ,

A Right to Anonymity in the Digital Age

Although digital anonymity is associated with a wide range of opportunities, it also stands in the way of successful criminal prosecution. The right to respect private and family life under the the EU Charter as well as the right to protection of personal data are of fundamental importance for natural persons. However, since life is increasingly taking place online, anonymity can be exploited to spread hate, discriminatory content, and fake news. Considering these risks, the ECJ has opened the door to data retention in Europe and thereby restricted digital anonymity.

2. Dezember 2024

, , , ,

Data Retention Laws and La Quadrature du Net II

La Quadrature du Net II has been criticized for allowing generalized metadata retention measures. However, it is important not to lose sight of the fact that the law must not become a mechanism for protecting criminals. The scale of online rights violations are a real problem. P2P networks are not only a threat to copyright protection, but also an environment for the distribution of content related to serious crime. It is therefore necessary to strike a balance between these two concerns and to propose solutions that adequately protect users without guaranteeing impunity for criminals.

2. Dezember 2024

, , , ,