Für den Frieden rüsten?

Aus der Aussage des Bundeskanzlers am 27. Februar 2022, dass veränderte Zeiten auch eine veränderte Politik verlangen, wird gern ein Plädoyer für eine primär militärische, auf Abschreckung zielende Politik abgeleitet, die sich nun endlich wieder an den politischen Realitäten orientiere könne, ganz wie es Vertreter des Realismus in den Internationalen Beziehungen, wie etwa John Mearsheimer fordern. Es ist geradezu atemberaubend, wie in kürzester Zeit in dieser Debatte ganze Denktraditionen mit offenkundiger Begeisterung zu Grabe getragen werden, ohne dass kritisch hinterfragt wird, ob dies gerechtfertigt ist: Zeigt der Ukrainekrieg denn wirklich, dass Diplomatie oder der Interdependenzansatz gescheitert ist? Wie klug kann eine Politik sein, die per „Zeitenwende“ einfach das Gegenteil des Vorangegangenen in Szene setzen will?

6. April 2022

Public Surveillance before the European Courts

Europe has experienced a significant expansion of state surveillance and counter-terrorism regimes, which demonstrate the increasing appetite of legislators and the executive for the normalisation of surveillance. For long, European Courts offered a powerful pushback against this trend and produced several celebrated victories for fundamental rights over surveillance. However, recent decisions by the CJEU and the ECtHR reveal a different picture, indicating a broader paradigm shift.

6. April 2022

, ,

On the Internet, No One Knows You’re a Cop

As long as police can continue to exploit the legal fiction of user “consent” to access our private communications, our privacy rights will remain just as fictional. While we’re hopeful that the courts will one-day strike this practice down as violating the Fourth Amendment, more urgent statutory protections are needed. The legislation needn’t be lengthy or complex, it’s not a nuanced question. To the contrary, what we need is a complete and categorical ban on the use of fake accounts by police, letting those who’ve been surveilled sue, and suppressing the evidence that’s obtained at trial.

5. April 2022

, ,

Hong Kong Surveillance Law

though 9/11 did not immediately result in a dramatic expansion of the surveillance state in Hong Kong as was often seen in the west, twenty years later a similar process is now well underway. Though Hong Kong’s surveillance and privacy laws have long been relatively deferential to the needs of law enforcement, the dramatic legal changes occasioned by the introduction of a new ‘national security law’ in 2020 suggest that the population will be under increasing forms of surveillance in the coming years.

4. April 2022

, , , ,

Rule of Law, AI, and »the Individual«

The institutional safeguards formulated under the Rule of Law tend to focus on “an individual” or “the individual” who can be the bearer of the rights and protections it awards. This pre-digital formulation worked well in an era where law was the pre-eminent form of social regulation. However, increasingly, individual interests are impacted not only on the basis of the actions and choices of the concerned individual, but also on the basis of data collected about her social context and that of other similarly situated individuals. In order to reconcile these tensions, in this blog, I argue for supplementing the existing individual protections recognized under the Rule of Law framework with recognition of collective interests in order to strengthen the Rule of Law in the age of AI.

3. April 2022

, , , ,

Internationale Rechtsordnung als nationales Sicherheitsinteresse

Die Zeitenwende vom 27. Februar 2022 ist faktisch das Eingeständnis einer Kluft zwischen den lang anerkannten Interessen an Multilateralismus und Völkerrecht einerseits und den außen- und verteidigungspolitischen Strategien zu deren Durchsetzung andererseits. Ein Bekenntnis zum Multilateralismus und den zugrunde liegenden rechtlichen Verpflichtungen reicht nicht mehr aus — wenn das überhaupt jemals der Fall war. Deutschlands künftige Nationale Sicherheitsstrategie muss sich mit den beschwerlicheren politischen und militärischen Verpflichtungen befassen, die notwendig sind, um ein solches System zu ermöglichen.

2. April 2022

,

International Legal Order as a National Security Interest

The "Zeitenwende" of 27 February 2022 is, in effect, an admission of a gap between long-recognised interests in multilateralism and international law, on the one hand, and the sufficiency of foreign and defence policy strategies for upholding them on the other. A primary commitment to the modes of multilateralism and underlying legal obligations is no longer sufficient—if indeed it ever was—and Germany’s forthcoming National Security Strategy must address the more arduous political and military obligations necessary to make such a system possible. The turning point is, in short, the realisation of commitments deeply embedded in national foreign policy identity, which emerges as the foundation for broad legitimacy in the policy revolution.

2. April 2022

, , ,

The Paradox of Efficiency: Frictions Between Law and Algorithms

On the 13th of January 2022, a Spanish Administrative court ruled in favour of algorithmic opacity. Fundación Civio, an independent foundation that monitors and accounts public authorities, reported that an algorithm used by the government was committing errors. BOSCO, the name of the application which contained the algorithm, was implemented by the Spanish public administration to more efficiently identify citizens eligible for grants to pay electricity bills. Meanwhile, Civio designed a web app to inform citizens whether they would be entitled for this grant.

2. April 2022

, , ,

A Constitutional Framework for Bundeswehr Operations Abroad Based on International Law

The postulated „Zeitenwende“ should not be understood simply as a historic opportunity to quickly pass the proposed reform in parliament. Even beyond the specific occasion of the Russian attack on Ukraine, the substance of the constitutional provisions on defence appears to be in need of reform. According to the opinion expressed here, the Basic Law should tie Bundeswehr missions abroad to their compliance with international law.

1. April 2022

, ,

Ein verfassungsrechtliches Fundament für Auslandseinsätze der Bundeswehr durch Bindung an das Völkerrecht

Die postulierte „Zeitenwende“ in der Sicherheitspolitik sollte nicht bloß als historische Chance verstanden werden, die vorgeschlagene Reform schnell durchs Parlament zu bekommen. Auch jenseits des konkreten Anlasses des russischen Angriffs auf die Ukraine erscheinen die materiellen verfassungsrechtlichen Grundlagen der Wehrverfassung reformbedürftig. Nach hier vertretener Auffassung sollte das Grundgesetz Auslandseinsätze der Bundeswehr an deren Völkerrechtsmäßigkeit binden. Denn wie die Initiatorinnen dieses Symposiums betonen, besteht für die deutsche Sicherheitspolitik auch eine Verantwortung für die internationale Ordnung und die Wahrung und Durchsetzung des Völkerrechts.

1. April 2022

, ,