Articles for category: Europa

Ein zwiespältiges Urteil

Gestern hat der Europäische Gerichtshof die Zulässigkeit des flämischen Schächtverbots bestätigt. Das entgegen dem Votum von Generalanwalt Hogan ergangene Urteil hat einen zwiespältigen Charakter: Es ist ein klares Signal zugunsten eines mitgliedstaatlichen Pluralismus im Bereich des Grundrechtsschutzes. Unvermeidliche Konsequenz ist, dass manche Grundrechte nicht das gleiche Gewicht bekommen wie in Deutschland. Kritisch ist zu vermerken, dass der EuGH den Pluralismus nur deshalb akzeptiert hat, weil der Gesetzgeber der Union ihn so vorgesehen hat.

18. Dezember 2020

, , ,

The Inviolability of National Centrals Banks as a Matter of EU Law

National authorities have to be extremely cautious in their dealings with National Central Banks in national investigations. Given the role of those in EU law, and their place within the EU legal order, today's judgment of the European Court of Justice should be seen as a stern warning to investigative authorities of the Member States. They must engage with the applicable EU institutions, prior to seizing documents of National Central Banks.

17. Dezember 2020

, ,

Frei, aber nicht unabhängig

Im Mai 2019 hatte der Europäische Gerichtshof (EuGH) entschieden, dass deutschen Staatsanwälten die notwendige Unabhängigkeit fehle, um einen Europäischen Haftbefehl auszustellen. Als Reaktion darauf plant die Bundesjustizministerin nun, ministerielle Einzelzuweisungen an die Staatsanwaltschaften für die EU-Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen im Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz ausdrücklich auszuschließen. Eine solche „quasi-richterliche Unabhängigkeit“ geht jedoch nicht nur am eigentlichen Problem vorbei, sondern liefe auch der staatsrechtlichen Einordnung der Staatsanwaltschaft im System der Gewaltenteilung zuwider.

14. Dezember 2020

, , ,

To Save the Rule of Law you Must Apparently Break It

The interpretative declaration of 10 December 2020 is set to go down in history as a dark page for the rule of law in the Union legal order. Regardless of whether this document will be challenged before Court in the coming sixty days, it represents an unprecedented attempt by the Member States to disregard the rule of law as their dominant organisation principle. The Union being a “Community based on the rule of law”, its members paradoxically seem to have damaged the Union in their effort to save it.

11. Dezember 2020

, ,

Rule-of-Law Conditionality and Resource Mobilization – the Foundations of a Genuinely ›Constitutional‹ EU?

The compromise negotiated by the German Presidency and agreed at the European Council’s meeting of 10-11 December has been roundly criticized for subordinating the hopes for a robust rule-of-law conditionality to the imperatives of "Next Generation Europe". From our perspective, the result may put the EU on the path toward a genuinely ‘constitutional’ transformation, one truly worthy of the name, rather than persisting as a system that is unable to mobilize resources in amounts commensurate with the challenges facing it.

11. Dezember 2020

LawRules #12: We need to talk about Financial Sanctions

As our podcast comes to an end, the year and the German presidency of the European Council do too. One of the foremost projects of the German presidency has been to link EU funding and compliance with rule of law standards. The mechanism is going to be a part of the next long-term budget of the Union, starting from 2021 – that is, if Hungary and Poland vote in favor of it, which is increasingly unclear at the moment, or if a way is found to circumvent their veto. The connection of rule of law violations and EU money, the advantages and shortcomings of financial sanctions for member states as well as how things stand on the current proposal – that’s what we discuss in this week’s final episode of We Need to Talk About the Rule of Law that we wrap up with an outlook on the current state of the Union, rule of law wise.

9. Dezember 2020

, , ,

Disqualifying Instability

The so-called conditionality mechanism (in other words: "money for the rule of law") provides that breaches of the principle of the rule of law that threaten the EU’s financial interests may lead to suspension of funding. Poland and Hungary oppose this conditionality as they – with good reason – fear that they might be affected by it. What is required not to be subject to this mechanism, however, is quite straightforward and can be reasonably expected by an EU Member State.

8. Dezember 2020

, ,