Articles for category: Regionen

Klimaschutz in Karlsruhe 5.0

Vor kurzem ließen mehrere Pressemitteilungen deutscher Umweltverbände Verfassungsrechtler:innen aufhorchen. Die vom Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland (BUND), Greenpeace, Germanwatch, dem Solarenergie-Förderverein Deutschland und der Deutschen Umwelthilfe (DUH) im Sommer/Herbst 2023 eingereichten „Zukunftsklagen“ werden in Karlsruhe offenbar ernst genommen. Im weiteren Verfahren könnte auch das kürzlich ergangene Gutachten des Internationalen Gerichtshofs (IGH) zu völkerrechtlichen Verpflichtungen der Staaten mit Bezug zum Klimawandel eine wichtige Rolle spielen.

26. August 2025

, ,

Trump’s Manufactured Emergencies

The Trump administration’s actions in Washington D.C. represent the continuation of interconnected political and rhetorical tactics that the president has used since his second inauguration that we should expect to see again and again – using misleading or downright fabricated information as the basis for declaring an emergency, relying on the fabricated emergency to invoke emergency legal authorities, and then relying on those authorities to take actions that exceed even the broad powers that such emergencies confer under the law. Looking ahead, we can expect the administration to run this same playbook in additional, predictable ways.

22. August 2025

, ,

The Next Episode On Gender-Based Asylum

&

One of the CJEU’s most talked-about recent cases asks a simple question: when does someone belong to a “particular social group” under EU refugee law? On 11 June 2024 in K, L v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (K, L), the CJEU found that, women who genuinely came to identify themselves with the fundamental value of equality between women and men during their stay in the host country can be regarded as belonging to a particular social group. However, the implementation of the K, L judgment has led to a divergence between national policy and national courts over the meaning of “identification with the fundamental value of equality between women and men.”

22. August 2025

, ,

Weaponising Disqualification

On August 20, 2025, the Indian Government introduced three constitutional amendment bills of massive implications in the Parliament. Together, the bills aim to establish a mandatory legal sanction providing that any minister can be removed from their ministerial office if arrested or detained for thirty consecutive days on charges carrying a potential sentence of five years or more. At first glance, the bills may seem laudatory, founded on the expectation of ethical standards for high constitutional office. Yet, one can clearly anticipate the gross impending misuse of this law towards establishing a hegemonic BJP rule in India.

22. August 2025

, ,

Palestine Action, Proscription and Proportionality

In July, the UK government has decided to proscribe the organisation Palestine Action. The order means that people are criminalised not just for expressing support for terrorist acts, but for the proscribed organisation. As a result, over 500 people were reportedly arrested at a protest in London on 9 August. Whether the decision pushes anti-terrorism law too far and violates freedom of expression will be assessed by the courts at a later date. If the decision survives a legal challenge, it could pave the way for proscription to be used in relation to a broader range of groups in future.

21. August 2025

, , ,

Pardons, Criminal Theory, and Political Sociology

Donald Trump’s use of the presidential pardon has transformed a constitutional power into a tool of personal loyalty and partisan retribution. Rather than correcting injustice, his pardons reward allies, shield loyalists, and punish critics. This shift reflects not only a philosophical challenge to the logic of criminal law, but also a deeper sociopolitical trend: the erosion of accountability through transactional governance. As legal boundaries blur and institutional checks falter, the rule of law itself is drawn into the orbit of authoritarian impulse.

21. August 2025

, , , ,

Safe for Everyone?

On 1 August, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) delivered its much-anticipated judgment, addressing the interpretation of the “safe country of origin” (SCO) concept under the Asylum Procedures Directive 2013/32 (APD). Contrary to AG de la Tour, the Court firmly ruled that Member States cannot designate a country as “safe” unless it provides adequate protection to its entire population. Ultimately, the Court’s judgment effectively preserves the current protection until the EU legislator fully exercises its prerogative to amend the rules.

20. August 2025

, , , ,

Klarheit für das Krankenhauswesen aus Karlsruhe?

Seit Jahren lähmt der Kompetenzkonflikt zwischen Bund und Ländern Reformen im Krankenhauswesen. Nun richten sich einige Länder mit einer abstrakten Normenkontrolle gegen Vorgaben des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses zu Mindestmengen und zur Personalbesetzung. Die aufgeworfenen verfassungsrechtlichen Fragen dürften auch für die große Krankenhausreform bedeutsam sein. Es geht um den Widerspruch zwischen qualitätsfördernder Zentralisierung und flächendeckender Versorgung. Eine Leerstelle der bisherigen Diskussion sind die Grundrechte der Patient:innen.

20. August 2025

, , , , , , ,

Tariftreue light

Ein neues Bundestariftreuegesetz soll den Bund dazu verpflichten, öffentliche Aufträge nur noch an solche Auftragnehmer:innen zu vergeben, die ihren Arbeitnehmer:innen tarifliche Arbeitsbedingungen gewähren – unabhängig davon, ob sie tarifgebunden sind oder nicht. Die Diskussion ist nicht neu: Die Ampel-Koalition scheiterte, bevor ihr Entwurf verabschiedet werden konnte. Am 6. August 2025 hat sich die Regierung im Kabinett auf einen neuen Entwurf geeinigt. Der Entwurf verfolgt das richtige Ziel, ist jedoch nicht konsequent genug, um die Tarifautonomie tatsächlich zu stärken.

20. August 2025

, , , , , , ,

Eroding Independence

On 7 August 2025, India’s Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi made serious allegations of large-scale voter fraud. Examining electoral rolls covering approximately 650,000 voters in one state assembly constituency within a parliamentary constituency, Gandhi claimed that over 100,000 voters had significant irregularities that hinted at manipulation. This post does not discuss the veracity of these allegations. Rather, the goal here is to contextualise these allegations against the backdrop of a sharp decline in the independence and trustworthiness of the Election Commission of India.

19. August 2025

, ,