»Da könnte was kommen«
Fünf Fragen an Gerhard Reissner
Articles for category: Regionen
»Something might be coming«
Five Questions to Gerhard Reissner
Musk, Techbrocracy, and Free Speech
In this blogpost, I situate and address Musk’s position within the broader EU debate on freedom of expression. The purpose of this symposium is to elucidate aspects that make Musk, his influence, and his provocations to the EU legal order, problematic under EU law, and, should we consider his influence as unwanted, harmful or illegal, whether EU law can provide answers to it. This post centres on three points: (i) Musk’s changes to X’s content moderation process, (ii) Musk’s usage of X to amplify select political candidates and (iii) Musk’s ownership of Starlink. It ends with a note on how this fits in a grander theme, which has been dubbed by commentators such as Paul Bernal as the ‘techbrocracy’.
Musk, Power, and the EU
At a time when calls for the EU to respond to Musk’s provocations multiply, critical questions about whether, why, and how the EU may react remain largely unanswered. Musk’s conduct, which spans sectors as diverse as social media (X, formerly Twitter), AI (xAI), satellite technology (Starlink), space rockets (SpaceX), and electric vehicles (Tesla), pose unique challenges to existing legal frameworks. His multi-industry influence gives rise to profound questions about the limits of individual influence and power accumulation in a complex geopolitical landscape.
Steht die Mindestlohnrichtlinie vor dem Aus?
Die im Oktober 2022 verabschiedete Richtlinie über angemessene Mindestlöhne in der EU sticht vor allem durch ihren hohen Symbolwert hervor. Dänemark sah die Richtlinie außerhalb der Kompetenzen des Unionsgesetzgebers und klagte, unterstützt von Schweden, vor dem Europäischen Gerichtshof. Am 14. Januar 2025 legte Generalanwalt Emiliou seine Schlussanträge vor. Niemand fällt aus allen Wolken, wenn der Generalanwalt bestätigt, dass sich der Unionsgesetzgeber mit der Mindestlohn-RL auf äußerst dünnes Eis begeben hat. Gleichwohl hätte man die Anträge so nicht erwartet. Der GA empfiehlt, die Richtlinie in vollem Umfang für nichtig zu erklären.
Targeting Disciplinary Courts
Hungary has faced significant challenges to judicial independence in recent years. The incumbent Chief Justice appears to have been working for some time to take control over disciplinary proceedings. In a recent development, the sweeping outrage of judges against planned structural reforms may have created the political opportunity to further silence dissenting voices. The Chief Justice’s New Year Greetings made it clear that the threat is real. Hungary could be on the verge of a full-scale judicial capture.
Austria’s Populist Turn
With the elections in September 2024, the populist Freedom Party (FPÖ) became the strongest party in Austria for the first time. In January 2025, hopes of averting populism quickly faded when Austria’s Federal President Alexander van der Bellen was left with no choice other than giving the FPÖ a mandate to form a government. In this context, two aspects stand out: the role of constitutional conventions in recent months and the political change in the Bundesländer (states).
The Branch That Finally Snapped
The story goes: a Polish politician, after allegedly committing a crime, leaves Poland and settles in Hungary. While historically not uncommon, the act of Hungary granting “asylum” to Marcin Romanowski generates crucial legal questions regarding the EU’s legal order. More specifically, what kind of asylum is at play here, whether this act was lawful from the perspective of the EU law, and what impact it has on the Union’s legal system.
How the Destroyers of Academic Freedom Masquerade Themselves as Its Victims
Under the authoritarian leadership of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, the government has started a culture war to dismantle the independence of academic institutions, including universities and the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, arguing that they represent a threat to their proudly proclaimed illiberal ideology. Ironically, after dismantling academic freedom in the country, Orbán’s administration started to claim that actually the liberals are the ones who, through "cancel culture", threaten academic freedom.
Den Pass im Visier
Das Staatsangehörigkeitsrecht ist ein fein austariertes Gefüge, das sowohl durch das Grundgesetz als auch durch das Völkerrecht bestimmt wird – und eben kein Instrument für gesellschaftspolitische Schnellschüsse. Zwar sind Staaten in ihrer Souveränität grundsätzlich frei, eigene Regeln für den Entzug oder Verlust der Staatsbürgerschaft festzulegen. Diese Freiheit findet ihre Grenzen jedoch nicht nur im Art. 16 des Grundgesetzes, sondern - wie dieser Beitrag aufzeigen soll – darüber hinaus auch im Völkerrecht.
