Am 30. Januar hat das Bundesarbeitsgericht dem EuGH Fragen zur Vorabentscheidung betreffend ein Kopftuchverbot vorgelegt. Hintergrund dieser und einer weiteren Vorlage ist eine mögliche Kollision der jüngsten deutschen und europäischen Rechtsprechung zu Kopftuchverboten, bei der das vergleichsweise hohe deutsche Schutzniveau zugunsten von Kopftuchträgerinnen auf dem Spiel steht.
Generalanwalt Nils Wahl hat gestern – für viele überraschend – für eine Zulässigkeit des deutschen Vignettensystems plädiert. Die Argumente des Generalanwalts überzeugen nicht. Jetzt hat der EuGH die Gelegenheit in seinem Urteil seiner Verantwortung zur Wahrung des Rechts bei der Auslegung und Anwendung der Verträge (Art. 19 EUV) nachzukommen.
A 2018 Italian Decree Law allows the revocation of citizenship based on a decision of the Minister of the Interior when a person has been convicted for terrorist offences. However, this provision specifically addresses immigrants and their children who became Italian citizens.
In Österreich kategorisiert ab 2019 ein Algorithmus arbeitslose Personen nach ihren Chancen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt. Kritikerinnen bezeichnen ihn als Paradebeispiel eines diskriminierenden Algorithmus. Was steckt dahinter? Und können Algortihmen überhaupt diskriminieren?
August 2018: Two reports make the rounds in Austrian media. One discusses data protection issues for persons on the so-called citizenship “Promi-Liste”. It tells a story of a Chinese investor, who offered a donation to a public university dean in exchange for assistance with receiving the Austrian citizenship. Meanwhile, another paper breaks the news with a related dicey topic: about 70 Austrians have received notice they are to lose their citizenship. The reason? They allegedly reacquired their native Turkish citizenship as evidenced by their alleged participation in a Turkish referendum.
Israel's Nation-State Law can be seen as an expression of the kind of democratic authoritarian populism that appears to be spreading globally. But it is no time to give up the game and there are examples that show how it is possible to counter the narrative of democratic authoritarian populism.
Much has been, and will be, written about what the Basic Law – Jewish Nation-State does, but attention is also due to how it does what it does. . The use of language in the Nation’s Law is so troubling in its sophist concealment of the meanings of the norms it encodes, that it creates, perhaps, injustice of the second order.
The opponents of Israel's Nation-State Law can be roughly divided into two camps. The first camp views the law and especially its Article 1 as racist while the second camp cosiders it as conflicting with basic democratic values because it does not include the right of equality. This group also views Article 1 as simply declarative, as from the moment of its establishment the State of Israel has defined itself as a Jewish state. How does Israeli law perceive racism? And how tenable is the proposition of the Law being merely declaratory?
Der US Supreme Court hat Präsident Trumps so genannten "Muslim Ban" mit der charakteristischen 5:4-Mehrheit der konservativen Richter aufgehoben, und damit im Prinzip den Einreisestopp für verfassungsgemäß erklärt. Die Entscheidung ist ein wichtiger Moment im Niedergang der US-amerikanischen Demokratie.
The Court of Justice of the European Union has not always enjoyed the reputation of being particularly LGBT-friendly, but its standing among those pushing for the better protection of rights of same-sex couples is likely to have improved considerably following Coman. While I agree with the substantive result of the decision, I am uncertain if the CJEU’s reasoning is equally convincing. My two main points of critique concern the interpretative techniques applied and the relationship between national identity and fundamental rights.
13. September 2025
Giovanni Capoccia
12. September 2025
Anne Peters
12. September 2025
Anne Peters