Articles for tag: Europarecht, Tierrechte, Vereinigtes Königreich

Nation of Animal Lovers

On May 12, 2021, the UK government published an Action Plan for Animal Welfare setting out reform plans to protect animals both within its borders and overseas. In this plan, the UK government pledges to further steps in its efforts to promote animal welfare and to recognize animals as sentient beings in law. As the ‘Nation of Animal Lovers’ the UK has a comparatively impressive record of animal welfare legislation. Yet, the tone of government communication is tainted by adversity against the EU in the context of Brexit.

17. Mai 2021

, ,

Fußball, Kartelle und Recht

Das „Super League“-Intermezzo hat den Finger in die Wunde des Spitzenfußballs gelegt. Die Rechtfertigung der bestehenden Strukturen leidet unter der zunehmenden Unfähigkeit, die Topteams in einem Wettbewerb zu halten, der diesen Namen auf nationaler Ebene und im Ligaalltag verdient. Das europäische Kartellrecht steht und stand den Verantwortlichen nicht im Wege, um Europa vor einer „Super League“ und bestehenden Oligopolen zu bewahren und dabei den breiten Wettbewerb zu fördern.

26. April 2021

, ,

Alles unter Verschluss

Das Bundesjustizministerium hat am 12. Dezember 2020 seinen Referentenentwurf zur Umsetzung der europäischen Whistleblowing-Richtlinie (2019/1937) (WBRL) an die Presse weitergereicht. Hinweise von Whistleblowern bezüglich Verschlusssachen sollen pauschal vom Anwendungsbereich der Richtlinie ausgenommen bleiben. In der Praxis würde die Effektivität des Schutzes von Hinweisgebern in staatlichen Behörden hierdurch massiv untergraben. Ein mutigerer Weg ist möglich: Die Einsetzung eines Bundestransparenzbeauftragten.

7. Januar 2021

,

Rule of (German) Law?

As I see it, the central question is whether Germany, just as it is an economic and a political power in the EU, is also a legal power. This would, of course, beg the question whether this notion makes sense by itself. Is it permitted to speak of legal power in the way it is preached for other forms of power? And supposing the notion applies to Germany as a Member State of the EU, may this national condition be aptly described as hegemonic? The ultimate question behind the questions just mentioned would be ‘How can this problem be tackled?’, assuming that it indeed turns out to be a problem.

12. Oktober 2020

,

On the Road to German Hegemony in EU Law?

The influence of the German legal tradition in the European legal community is unquestionable. No other European country has displayed, like Germany has, such an articulate and institutionalized effort of promotion of its own legal system and thinking. The project paid off. EU Law displays an obvious German imprint that is now enforced in twenty-seven Member States. Lawyers throughout the European continent learn German to read the high-quality legal literature produced in German universities and research centers, courts and public institutions. The ultimate sign of intellectual distinction of a European lawyer is to “read the Germans”. No other feature can surpass in pedigree a lawyer’s fluency and ability to dominate German concepts in their very own words.

7. Oktober 2020

,

It’s Urgent

In a remarkable move, the Member States appointed, on 2 September 2020, an Advocate General put forward by Greece, who will enter into office on 7 September 2020 if Member States get their way. There is a ginormous problem with this move, as the office that this Advocate General will try to fill, as things stand, does not become vacant until October 2021. Eleanor Sharpston, the officeholder presently in situ, remains there until then. Any other reading of EU law is tantamount to the Member States sacking a member of the Court in direct violation of the primary law. This is a wholly unacceptable scenario in a Union grounded and predicated upon the rule of law. Urgent measures are thus necessary to save not only the legitimacy of the Court, but that of the EU.

3. September 2020

, , ,

Das Virus im Unionsrecht – in der Not kein Gebot?

Die Nachrichten dieser Tage erwecken den Eindruck, dass das Unionsrecht in der Coronakrise ausgedient hat. Nationale Alleingänge, staatliche Egoismen und Grenzabschottungen sind an die Stelle des Binnenmarktes und des „Raums der Sicherheit, der Freiheit und des Rechts“ getreten. Vollzieht sich vor unser aller Augen ein historischer Bruch mit der EU als Rechtsgemeinschaft? Schaut eine ins home office geschickte und kompetenziell gelähmte Kommission dem Zusammenbruch ihrer Existenzgrundlage wehrlos zu? Oder ist in Wahrheit von Rechtsbruch keine Rede, weil diese Rechtsgemeinschaft genügend Instrumente vorsieht, mit denen die Mitgliedstaaten angemessen auf die Gesundheits-, Wirtschafts- und Finanzkrise reagieren können?

16. März 2020

, ,

In Defense of Academic Freedom and Autonomy

We, members of the academic community, hereby express our full support to the Editors-in-Chiefs, the Editorial and Scientific Advisory Board who resigned en masse from the European Law Journal, owned by Wiley. The conduct of the publishing house has shown total lack of appreciation of the values of academic integrity and autonomy. The Scientific Board’s brave move seeks not to be praised as heroic, but it firmly posits decency and respect for these principles above all other considerations.

6. Februar 2020

,

Wiley and the European Law Journal

We want to believe that no self-respecting scholar will allow himself or herself to be used in any way by Wiley to defeat the principled stand taken by the Editors and Boards of the ELJ. It is we, scholars of European Law, who actually give commercial value to such a journal by submitting and publishing our work in its pages. We should not be complicit in undermining the most basic values of the scholarly world.

4. Februar 2020

,

What a Journal Makes: As we say goodbye to the European Law Journal

On January 31st, the Editorial and Advisory Boards of the European Law Journal resigned en masse from their positions in protest after the publisher, Wiley, decided that it was not willing to ‘give away’ control and authority over editorial appointments and decisions to the academics on the journal’s Boards. We recount our small act of resistance here because we think there may be lessons for the wider academic community.

4. Februar 2020

, ,