Why Australia’s Campaign Finance Reform is Likely to Face Constitutional Challenge

After decades of gridlock on campaign finance reform at the federal level in Australia, the major parties reached a deal to pass the Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Reform) Act 2025 (Cth) on almost the last parliamentary sitting day before a forthcoming election. The new law will not take effect until after the election. It will lower the threshold for the disclosure of donations and ensure disclosures are published more quickly. It will also impose a cap on political donations and a cap on electoral expenditure. This all sounds like a great improvement for transparency and fairness in election campaigning. In theory, it is. So why and how could it be the subject of a successful constitutional challenge?

From Democracy to Dynastic Rule?

On January 30, 2025, the National Assembly of Nicaragua approved a constitutional reform that significantly strengthens the power of President Daniel Ortega and his wife, Vice President Rosario Murillo. The amendments profoundly transform the country’s political system, reinforcing the Executive’s influence over other branches of the state. This analysis aims to trace the political evolution of Nicaragua in order to better understand how the constitutional framework of the state is changing now.

Vielfalt am Rande

Vom öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunk dürfen wir ein Programm erwarten, das die Grundsätze der Objektivität und Unparteilichkeit achtet und Themen- und Meinungsvielfalt möglichst breit und ausgewogen darstellt – so zumindest verlangt es § 26 Abs. 2 S. 2 MStV. Doch kann ein Sendungsformat, das als „Wahlarena“ gebrandet und kurz vor der Bundestagswahl 2025 ausgestrahlt wird, jedoch nur bestimmte Parteien berücksichtigt, diesem Vielfaltsgedanken Rechnung tragen? Ja, sagt das OVG NRW – nein, sagt der VGH Baden-Württemberg.

Transgender Rights at a Crossroads in the United States

In his first month in office, US President Donald Trump has issued a series of sweeping executive orders targeting transgender rights. These orders build on political terrain that is now exceedingly hostile to transgender rights. In this post, I briefly examine the landscape for transgender rights in the United States, analyze what President Trump’s executive orders on transgender rights aim to do, and then discuss the stakes of United States v. Skrmetti, the pending Supreme Court case that will likely set out the framework that federal courts will use in adjudicating transgender rights cases under the Trump administration and beyond.

Voraussetzungen des Vertrauens im Auslieferungsrecht

Die Auslieferung von Maja T. nach Ungarn im Juni 2024 hat erhebliche verfassungsrechtliche Bedenken aufgeworfen. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat in seinem Urteil vom 24. Januar 2025 das Kammergericht nun für seine Entscheidung und die unzureichende Prüfung der Haftbedingungen in Ungarn kritisiert. Das Urteil betont die Pflicht der Gerichte, Zusicherungen im Auslieferungsverfahren nicht ungeprüft zu akzeptieren und stärkt die Position von Personen in Auslieferungsverfahren.

Constitutionally Capturing Pakistan’s Constitutional Courts

In 2024, Pakistan’s parliament passed a constitutional amendment carrying out the most significant restructuring of Pakistan’s superior judiciary in its recent history. This judicial overhaul needs to be analyzed as part of a process of regime realignment. By regime realignment, I mean a ruling authoritarian elite radically altering its supportive political structure and popular bases to expand and extend its hold on power. Based on news sources and conversations with senior lawyers and judges, I will show that this plan for judicial overhaul developed iteratively through a process of intra- and inter-institutional dialogue and conflict that took place during regime realignment.

Ukraine’s Constitutional Order in Wartime

Ukraine’s constitutional order is facing an unprecedented challenge due to Russia’s ongoing aggression. The war has forced the nation to navigate between maintaining democratic governance and ensuring national survival, all while operating under martial law. The looming expiration of presidential and parliamentary terms has sparked debates on legitimacy of the wartime governance. While wartime elections are neither feasible nor constitutionally required, legitimacy is upheld through constitutional provisions, political consensus, and international recognition.

Keine Wahl

In Deutschland leben schätzungsweise 13 Millionen Menschen mit Behinderungen. Viele von ihnen werden ihre Stimme am 23. Februar weder in allgemeiner noch in geheimer Wahl abgeben können. Denn eine erhebliche Zahl von Wahllokalen ist nicht barrierefrei. Dafür hat der UN-Fachausschuss für die Rechte von Menschen mit Behinderung Deutschland 2023 gerügt und empfohlen, „die Barrierefreiheit von Wahlunterlagen und Wahllokalen bundesländerübergreifend, insbesondere in ländlichen Gebieten, und bei der Entwicklung elektronischer Wahlsysteme sicherzustellen.“ Das ist noch immer nicht flächendeckend passiert.

Voting from Abroad Ahead of Germany’s 2025 Snap Election

Over the past few weeks, several reports have appeared in German media on expected challenges with postal voting from abroad ahead of Germany’s snap election scheduled for 23 February 2025. For example, the recent case of a German citizen living in South Africa highlighted that ballot papers will be sent to registered postal voters only in the first week of February, whereas normally this is done six weeks ahead of election day. We suggest that countries should formally allow and facilitate postal voting for citizens living abroad via their country’s diplomatic missions and official courier services.