Policing the Police

Menschen, die polizeiliches Handeln filmen, sind deswegen immer wieder strafrechtlicher Verfolgung ausgesetzt. Der Artikel analysiert die rechtliche Unsicherheit im Zusammenhang mit § 201 StGB, der Tonaufnahmen ohne Zustimmung unter Strafe stellt, und beschreibt die potentiell einschüchternde Wirkung dieser Praxis auf Bürger*innen und Journalist*innen. Grund- und menschenrechtliche Überlegungen legen nahe, dass solche Aufnahmen straffrei gestellt werden sollten, um rechtsstaatliche Kontrolle und Transparenz polizeilichen Handelns zu gewährleisten.

Can the Rule of Law Be Restored by Violating Its Principles?

This post concerns one of the crucial problems of transitional constitutionalism after a period of democratic and rule of law backsliding: how to restore the principle of the rule of law? Are there circumstances when, during this restoration, the principles of the rule of law are allowed to be violated? For instance, when the violation of the rule of law was an important tool to exercise arbitrary power, as was the case before the 1989-1990 East-Central European democratic transitions?

Die Idee der Staatsräson im neuesten deutschen Recht

Wer sich von rechtszerstörenden Fiktionen heute ein Bild machen will, lese das kürzlich veröffentlichte und inzwischen rechtskräftige Urteil der 9. Kammer des Verwaltungsgerichts Regensburg vom 7. Oktober 2024. Es ist eine der ersten bekannt gewordenen gerichtlichen Entscheidungen, die zu der im Juni 2024 in Kraft getretenen Reform des Staatsangehörigkeitsrechts ergangen sind.

Democracy and the Election Commission of India

As I write this review on the eve of 2025, much hasn’t changed when it comes to the status of democracy in India. If anything, there are increasing concerns that the gains of democratic consolidation since the inauguration of the Indian Constitution are withering away and giving ample space for the entrenchment of a majoritarian, anti-democratic political culture. The vile and morally corrupt politics of the Bharatiya Janata Party (“BJP”) have struck a chord with the voters, who continue to support its exclusionist vision of India.

Das AfD-Verbot in der Sackgasse?

Nach vielen Monaten der öffentlichen Diskussion um die Einleitung eines Parteiverbotsverfahrens gegen die AfD liegt dem Bundestag nun eine fraktionsübergreifende Beschlussvorlage zur Abstimmung vor. Doch von der Einbringung der Beschlussvorlage in den Bundestag bis zur Einreichung einer entsprechenden Antragsschrift in Karlsruhe ist es noch ein weiter Weg, der infolge vorgezogener Neuwahlen und der damit einhergehenden Diskontinuität des Bundestages vorerst in eine Sackgasse führen dürfte.

Blinded by Legality

The Venice Commission’s recent opinions on Poland’s judicial reforms have prioritized formal legality over substantive judicial independence. The Commission thereby effectively legitimizes the judiciary captured under the previous autocratic government. The Commission’s shift contrasts sharply with its own prior critiques and European court rulings, raising concerns that the Commission’s stance now shields autocracy under the guise of legality.

Charting Change

The ongoing reform of the Polish Prosecution Service, initiated by separating the roles of Prosecutor General and Minister of Justice, aims to restore the rule of law and enhance the institution's independence and effectiveness. Yet, achieving this goal requires comprehensive reforms to address longstanding issues and external factors. Success hinges on legislative support, particularly from the Ministry of Justice, and overcoming resistance to change among prosecutors, marking a potential new era for the institution.

One Year After Wałęsa v. Poland

Despite some progress, the Polish government faces immense political and structural hurdles in implementing ECtHR judgments concenring the rule of law. Because November 2025 marks one year since the ECtHR issued the pilot judgment in Wałęsa v. Poland, it is a good moment to reflect on the progress made by the current authorities in implementing ECtHR judgments. This post delves into the steps taken, the obstacles ahead, and the question of whether a coherent plan exists to navigate this legal and constitutional crisis.

At Risk of Capture?

On December 21st, the mandates of three judges of the Italian Constitutional Court will expire, creating a total of 4 vacancies. While Parliament is responsible for filling the seats, political parties are far from reaching an agreement on who should get appointed. The majority’s strategic obstruction of the appointment process in combination with Meloni’s assertions that it is up to her political majority to “deal the cards” for these elections raise the specter of the Court’s politicization. While the Italian legal system has several safeguards to preserve the impartiality and effectiveness of its Constitutional Court, these do not immunizes it against practices that could slowly and almost imperceptibly undermine its independence.

Why Taiwan’s Constitutional Court Is in Danger

Legislators from the leading party in Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan are moving to pass an amendment that could effectively paralyze the Constitutional Court. Under the proposed changes to the Constitutional Court Procedure Act, the Court may find itself unable to carry out its constitutional mandate. This week, Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan will deliberate the amendments. If the amendments are passed in their current form, Taiwan could face nothing less than a full-blown constitutional crisis.