Europas Werk und Deutschlands Beitrag

Menschenrechte werden in stürmischen Zeiten erkämpft. Und bleiben umkämpft. Wir sind aktuell Zeug:innen davon, wie in der Flüchtlingspolitik – wieder einmal - menschenrechtlich erkämpfte Prinzipien in rasanter Geschwindigkeit offen infrage gestellt werden. Als SPD, Grüne und FDP 2021 ihren Koalitionsvertrag unterzeichneten, wollten sie das »Leid an den Außengrenzen« beenden. Nichts weniger als einen »Paradigmenwechsel« versprach die Ampel. Seit kurzer Zeit ist nun bekannt, dass die Bundesregierung von diesem Vorhaben entschieden abgerückt ist. In einem ersten Schritt hat sie eine äußerst restriktive Verhandlungsposition zur Reform des Gemeinsamen Europäischen Asylsystems (GEAS) eingenommen, die Anfang Juni im Rat der Europäischen Union debattiert wird.

Can the Mexican Supreme Court Save Constitutional Democracy?

The last week of the legislative term in Mexico was just another showcase of the clear government's disdain for democratic institutions and the rule of law. At the end of April, MORENA, the party in government, used its legislative majorities to hastily pass a series of laws in violation of different procedural rules, including quorum rules. The episode described above isn’t uncommon in Mexico’s legislative politics. The quality of the political-constitutional discourse is in great need of improvement to prevent such episodes from happening. It seems that the Supreme Court is the only institution that could contribute (and has been trying to contribute) to repair it. However, in the current political environment, Supreme Court interventions in political processes are becoming increasingly dangerous to the extent that its survival is at stake.

Versammlungskontrolle und Versammlungsfreiheit

Der 1. Mai bietet jedes Jahr die Möglichkeit, auf dynamische Versammlungsgeschehen ausgerichtete polizeiliche Einsatzkonzepte wie unter dem Brennglas zu analysieren. Dabei hat sich in den letzten Jahren die Polizeitaktik der „Demobegleitung“ als Teil des sog. Deeskalationsprinzips durchgesetzt. In der Praxis zeichnet sich dieses Konzept durch eine starke polizeiliche Präsenz und frühzeitiges Einschreiten aus. Entsprechende Einsatzkonzepte werden weithin akzeptiert und lediglich einzelne überschießende Maßnahmen kritisiert. Doch mit Blick auf die Wirkungen des Einsatzkonzepts, insbesondere auf die Wahrnehmung der Versammlungsfreiheit aus Art. 8 I GG, ist die Ausweitung jener Praxis hoch problematisch. Denn von der Versammlungsfreiheit bleibt wenig übrig, wenn faktisch die Polizei die Demonstration veranstaltet.

Taiwan’s Participatory Plans for Platform Governance

Platform regulation is not limited to Europe or the United States. Although much debate currently focuses on the latest news from Brussels, California, or Washington, other important regulatory ideas emerge elsewhere. One particularly consequential idea can be found in Taiwan. Simply put, Taiwan wants to, tacitly, democratize platform governance. Concretely, Taiwan wanted to establish a dedicated body that would potentially facilitate far-reaching civil society participation and enable ongoing citizen involvement in platform governance. This article explains what discourses about platform governance can learn from Taiwan and how vivid democratic discourse shapes platform governance beyond traditional regulatory models.

50 Years of Kesavananda Bharti

India is celebrating the 50th anniversary of the landmark Kesavananda Bharti decision this year, which concretized the ‘basic structure doctrine’. Created by the judiciary in response to an overzealous executive branch, it stipulates that the legislature cannot damage or destroy the basic features of the Constitution that are fundamental to its identity. This blogpost explains the circumstances of the doctrine's inception, its substance and controversies as well as its continued importance for Indian democracy.

Of Red Fruits and Social Conflict

These days of electoral campaign in Spain, as usual, water is among the current issues. Recently, a controversial proposal by the conservative parties of the Andalusian Parliament aims to re-grant the status of agricultural land to certain land in the vicinity of the Doñana National Park (Huelva, Spain). Doñana suffers a long social conflict triggered by several decisions adopted to protect this singular place. As we will see, this is a clear example of the political use of the tension generated by environmental protection and socio-economic interests, especially in times of elections.

Accountability in Brazil

The end of Jair Bolsonaro’s presidency is far from marking a return to normality in Brazil. After the riots of 8 January, which aimed to create the conditions for a coup in Brazil, authorities and institutions had to deal with several turbulences and the issue of Bolsonaro's responsibilization has been a permanent concern. To evaluate the efficacy of these responses, it is important to discuss how these institutions have been dealing with Jair Bolsonaro’s legacy. Moreover, it is equally important to understand the challenges President Lula is facing, which are partly due to the difficulty to reach political compromises. The recent police raids that seized documents and devices in Bolsonaro’s house, and arrested some of his direct aids, adds complexity to the situation, as we will attempt to explain.

The UK vs the ECtHR

In recent months, the UK government has tabled two Bills - the Bill of Rights Bill and the Illegal Migration Bill - before Parliament which would have the consequence - and almost certainly have the intention - of setting the UK on a collision course with the Council of Europe, and especially the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). This post details how these Bills serve to undermine the UK’s obligations under the ECHR and explains their significance within the larger debate surrounding the UK’s possible withdrawal from the Convention. It places this debate in the context of the rarely-convened Council of Europe summit of heads of state and government in Reykjavik in May 2023, whose ambitious agenda is to protect the ‘common heritage’ of respect for human rights, democracy and the rule of law in the face of Russia’s aggression in Ukraine and other existential threats.

JA, sie ist rechtsextrem

Seit 2019 wurde die „Junge Alternative“ als Verdachtsfall geführt. Nun hat das Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV) neben dem „Institut für Staatspolitik“ und dem Verein „Ein Prozent“ auch die Jugendorganisation der AfD als gesichert rechtsextremistisch eingestuft. Die Einstufung hat unmittelbare Konsequenzen für die „Junge Alternative“ und mittelbare Auswirkungen auf die AfD. Einen erheblichen Schaden wird die Partei aber nicht davontragen.