Thema: Gender & LGBTIQ

Verfassungsrechtliche Aspekte der Geschlechtergleichstellung, LGBTIQ-Rechte, Anerkennung sexueller Orientierung und Geschlechtsidentität, Antidiskriminierungsrecht und verfassungsrechtlicher Schutz vor geschlechtsbezogener Diskriminierung. Umfasst Eheöffnung, Geschlechtsanerkennungsgesetze, reproduktive Rechte und verfassungsrechtliche Gleichheitsjurisprudenz.

Sexarbeit und Gewerberecht

Ein Jahr nach Inkrafttreten des Prostituiertenschutzgesetzes (ProstSchG) bot sich mir die Gelegenheit, einen längeren Überblicksbeitrag zum seinerzeit noch recht neuen Gesetz zu verfassen. Ich wählte für den Aufsatz eine Überschrift, mit der ich heute etwas hadere: „Gewerberecht der Sexualität: Das Prostituiertenschutzgesetz“. Auf der Suche nach einer (scheinbar) griffigen Überschrift habe ich die Ambivalenz dieser Überschrift nicht verkannt, sondern gesucht. Die irritierenden Assoziationen, die sich ergeben, wenn die Kommerzialisierung („Gewerbe“) von Sexualität zum Thema rechtlicher Regulierung wird, habe ich eher als rhetorische Herausforderung begriffen, ohne die brutalen Schattenseiten der Sexarbeit hinreichend zum Problem zu machen.

25. Oktober 2023

, , ,

When Discrimination is Not Enough

The Supreme Court, India’s apex constitutional court, recently delivered its disappointing decision in Supriyo Chakraborty v Union India (Supriyo), rejecting marriage equality in Indian law. The much-awaited decision was heard by a constitution bench (five judges) of the Supreme Court and dealt with far-reaching questions of both Indian constitutional law and family law. The decision is characteristic of the Indian Supreme Court’s ongoing phase of great deference to the executive and legislative branches but also marks a sharp and worrying break from the court’s otherwise progressive jurisprudence on issues of gender and sexuality.

22. Oktober 2023

, , , , ,

Das Konzept der Nachhaltigkeit auf dem Pfad des Feminismus?

Faktisch sind Frauen* stärker von den Auswirkungen durch die Überschreitungen der planetaren Grenzen, insbesondere des Klimawandels und der damit verbundenen Naturkatastrophen, betroffen. Obgleich nicht alle Frauen* und keineswegs nur Frauen* tangiert sind, ist eine sog. genderspezifische Vulnerabilität messbar, da sich Gender oft mit anderen Merkmalen wie einer schlechteren sozio-ökonomischen Stellung oder einem erschwerten Zugang zu Ressourcen z. B. Land und Finanzmitteln überschneidet. Frauen* sind aber nicht nur passive Betroffene, sondern übernehmen auch aktiv Führungsrollen zugunsten von Klimaschutz und Klimawandelanpassung, beispielsweise im lokalen Wassermanagement oder in der Rechtsdurchsetzung.

16. Juni 2023

, , ,

Strasbourg’s Coming Out

On June 1st, in Maymulakhin and Markiv v. Ukraine, the ECtHR determined for the first time in clear terms that the general absence of legal recognition for same-sex couples is discriminatory and violates Article 14 of the European Convention of Human Rights. This marks a significant addition to the Court’s case-law concerning the rights of same-sex couples with implications for future litigation on this subject.

5. Juni 2023

, , , ,

A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia

In the recent case of Digashu and Seiler-Lilles the Namibian Supreme Court held that denying the recognition of same-sex spouses under the Immigration Control Act 1993 was not only a violation of the right to dignity under the Namibian Constitution, but also amounted to unfair discrimination. While limited in scope, the judgement is a win for the rights of LGBTQIA+ persons in a jurisdiction where they remain mostly unrecognized. It is also notable for its use of comparativism as a deliberative resource.

29. Mai 2023

, , ,

Marriage Equality at the Doors of the Indian Supreme Court

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India recently heard over 20 petitions seeking marriage equality. The significance of a positive declaration cannot be overstated. It would make India only the second country in Asia to recognize LGBTQ+ marriages. As India becomes the world’s most populous country this year, a favorable decision would also mean that an estimated 17.7% of the world’s population would come under a marriage equality regime which is more than the cumulative population of the 34 countries that currently recognize such marriages (17% of the global population).

24. Mai 2023

, , ,

If the EU Picks Baby Genes

Which genes should children not inherit? This is a fundamental question. It arises acutely in medically assisted reproduction, such as in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or artificial insemination. One must frequently choose between different donors, sperm, eggs or embryos. The EU wishes to draw this line. However, Its proposed Substances of Human Origin Regulation (‘SoHO’) treads into delicate ethical and political territory, without properly addressing, or even mentioning, crucial ethical questions. This leads the EU to silently take three controversial positions: the proposal excludes most ethical considerations; it draws the line vaguely and below existing ethical standards; and it makes genetic selection mandatory in genetically assisted reproduction.

26. April 2023

, , , ,

Battling the hydra in EU anti-discrimination law

Can a company refuse to conclude or renew a contract with a self-employed person because he is gay? And may contractual freedom prevail over the prohibition of discrimination in such a situation? A short answer stemming from the recent ECJ judgment in J.K. v. TP would be a resounding no. Yet, a further analysis is in order because the judgment also brings a significant shift in the ECJ’s anti-discrimination case law.

31. Januar 2023

, , , , , , ,

No New Rights in Fedotova

In Fedotova and others v Russia issued on 17 January 2023, the ECtHR held that Russia had breached its positive obligation to secure the applicants’ right to respect for their private and family life under Article 8 of the Convention by failing to provide any form of legal recognition and protection for same sex couples. The ground-breaking aspect of the judgment is the clear rejection by the Court of the justifications advanced by the Contracting State.

27. Januar 2023

, , , ,

The many troubles of the Fedotova judgment

On 17 January 2023, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights ruled in Fedotova v Russia that the absence of any legal recognition and protection for same-sex couples amounts to a violation of Art. 8 of the Convention. For 30 Member States of the Council of Europe (CoE), this judgment changes nothing since their legal orders already allow same-sex couples to enter into marriage or into other forms of legally recognised relationships. For the remaining countries, however, the Fedotova judgment amounts to an external judicial pressure to change their legal landscape in a politically very sensitive area of LGBT+ rights. Fedotova is probably the most political judgment of all times.

24. Januar 2023

, , , ,