Decision-Making under Uncertainty
Federal emergency brakes, debt brakes and other methods of constitutional speed control.
Thema: Notstand & Krisen
Notstandsverfassungsrecht und Krisenregierung für alle Formen außergewöhnlicher Umstände. Umfasst verfassungsrechtliche Rahmen für Ausnahmezustände, Kriegsbefugnisse, Finanzkrisen, Pandemien, Naturkatastrophen und andere Krisensituationen, die außergewöhnliche staatliche Reaktionen erfordern. Umfasst verfassungsrechtliche Regulierung von Notstandsbefugnissen, Krisenmanagement und verfassungsrechtliche Kontinuität während Notlagen jeglicher Art.
Entscheiden unter Unsicherheiten
Bundesnotbremsen, Schuldenbremsen und andere Waschmittel mit gebremstem Schaum
Epidemie ohne epidemische Lage
In der Gewissheit, bald von der Last des Amts befreit zu sein, macht sich jetzt auch der Bundesminister für Gesundheit locker. Der Bundestag solle die bis zum 25.11.2021 wirksame Feststellung einer „epidemischen Lage von nationaler Tragweite“ nicht mehr verlängern, genauer gesagt: ihr Fortbestehen nicht noch einmal feststellen. Wird also der 26.11.2021 zum Freedom Day?
A Shared Responsibility Model
Piecemeal and fragmented policymaking during Covid-19 underscored the need for an equity-focused global health agenda. Yet, most responses were nationally-focused, lacked global commitment and solidarity, failed to notify the WHO of novel outbreaks, and were non-compliant with its professional recommendations.
Webinar: Addressing Scientific Innovation through Pandemic Lawmaking
Amid contention that global governance was unprepared and incapacitated in its response to the COVID-19 pandemic, this November, a special session of the World Health Assembly will convene to discuss a potential international instrument on pandemic preparedness and response. As part of the "International Pandemic Lawmaking: Conceptual and Practical Issues" symposium which is publishing critical insights and recommendations for this potential pandemic treaty each day on Bill of Health and Verfassungsblog, this is the second webinar examines the issues, challenges and opportunities related to scientific innovation.
Scientific Innovation in International Pandemic Lawmaking
More inclusive models for scientific data sharing at the international level clearly can and must be devised. Doing so will require stronger commitments by states, improved multilateral mechanisms, and legal rules that facilitate the fair allocation of fruits of scientific progress without influence from competing agendas.
Addressing IP Barriers in the Context of a Pandemic Treaty
By relying on the private sector in the context of COVID-19, many countries are struggling to secure adequate personal protective equipment, testing kits, and, more importantly. life-saving vaccines. A radical paradigm shift is needed from a market-based paradigm to one that encourages more scientific collaboration transcending national, regional, and global levels.
Im Ausgang deutlich
Vor mehr als 18 Monaten trat in Bayern – zum ersten Mal in der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik – ein flächendeckendes, landesweites Ausgangsverbot in Kraft. In die darauffolgende leidenschaftliche rechtswissenschaftliche Debatte ist zwischenzeitlich deutlich Ruhe eingekehrt. In dieser nun deutlich entspannten Lage entschied am Montag der Bayerische Verwaltungsgerichtshof als erstes Verwaltungsgericht in einer Hauptsache über die Maßnahme, die wie keine zweite für die heikle Wirkmacht der staatlichen Pandemiebekämpfung steht.
Taking Data Sharing Seriously
COVID-19 demonstrated the interconnectedness of the world and that our collective protection and well-being is contingent on our individual response. The importance of solidarity and acting in the public interest became key messages in public health, as too were these principles justified as the basis for data-sharing across borders. Accessing this data was critical and its timely access to this data was essential in research for the much-needed new vaccines.
International Pandemic Lawmaking: Some Perspectives from Behavioural Economics
In this brief essay, we wish to highlight some insights from behavioural economics that can contribute to a successful process of international pandemic lawmaking. Our interest here is not to engage with individual or collective psychological reactions to pandemics or other large-scale risks, or with substantive policy made in their wake. Several such behavioural issues and dimensions have been dealt with elsewhere, not without (ongoing) spirited debate. Here, however, while building on related frameworks of analysis from the field of behavioral economics, as applied to international law (including nudge theory), our focus is on the process and design of pandemic international law-making.
